commend Craig Brittain ? Hopefully not . The wannabe unibrow pull ahead attention a few years agofor running a truly malevolent revenge pornography racketcalled Is Anybody Down . Now his revenge porno daysare finally over .
The Federal Trade Commissionjust banned Brittainfrom sharing bare photos of people without their consent . As part of the settlement , Brittain will also have to demolish the 1,000 - plus naked exposure and personal item of strangers that he ’s collected through his sick - ass revenge porn business . The FTC did not impose a amercement .
And while the dying of one revenge smut headpin is great news , you have to wonder : Why is n’t this sort of thing directly up illegal ?
Well , we ’re getting there . Several United States Department of State have been passing their own laws to speak America ’s revenge porn problem . Californiais leading the wayand fairly recently send someone to jail for retaliation smut - connect criminal offence . Meanwhile , the FBIhas investigated revenge porn ringsin the past — namely Is Anybody Up , the site that Brittain was mimicking . The FTC ’s latest move put an important precedent that these type of businesses will not be tolerated .
https://gizmodo.com/finally-someone-is-going-to-jail-for-revenge-porn-1665702267
justifiedly so ! Just look atthe bureau ’s description of Brittain ’s offenses :
Brittain take the images in a number of ways , such as by posing as a woman on the publicizing land site Craigslist , and offer nude exposure supposedly of himself in exchange for exposure cater by cleaning woman . When char provided him with the photos , Brittain post them on his site without their cognition or permission .
In addition to collecting and posting the figure of speech himself , Brittain solicited viewers of his site to anonymously submit nude picture of multitude to his site , according to the ailment . He command submissions to include sensitive personal selective information about the people in the picture , including their full name , town and land , phone number and Facebook visibility .
The ailment also say that Brittain offered a “ bountifulness system of rules ” on his website , wherein users could provide a reward of at least $ 100 in exchange for other users finding pictures and information about a specific individual .
Brittain wo n’t be doing that sorting of thing any more . And nobody should . Because it ’s sick and it ’s wrong and it should be illegal everywhere . Banning someone from the revenge porn line of work is a step in the right counseling — next we need to ban revenge porn altogether . [ FTC ]
CrimeRevenge porn
Daily Newsletter
Get the best tech , science , and culture news in your inbox daily .
tidings from the future , delivered to your present .
You May Also Like
