There is great deal of scientific evidence indicating that writing by hand is an of import attainment . Compared to typing , writing by hand seems to activate the brain in ways that aid you process and remember information . Whether you need to con cursive to enter the full benefit of writing by hand , however , is another tarradiddle .
KQEDrecently foreground scientific discipline author Philip Ball ’s dive into whether cursive is more beneficial for kids ’ learning than printing atNautilis . There ’s no conclusive research to show that learning cursive is uniquely beneficial , Ball writes , cite neuroscientist Karin Harman James , who take early brain development . glob continues :
There is some research that has find out that cursive aids dyslexic student , in part because it does n’t require taking the pencil off the paper as often , but other inquiry demonstrate that because cursive adds yet another bed of complexity to writing , kids can learn to write more quickly , and indite more decipherably and accurately , using manuscript .
With the lack of scientific consensus about whether one eccentric of committal to writing is superscript for learning , it ’s clear that school policy that require cursive are more about culture than research . Cursive is required as early as kindergarten in France , and insome U.S. states , students are require to proficiently indite in cursive by a sure point in their elemental school life history ( fifth grade in Alabama , third ground level in California ) .
afford how deeply parent and masses who compose educational activity insurance policy feel about cursive—“People talk about the decline of script as if it ’s proof of the fall of civilization , " Anne Trubek , author ofThe History and Uncertain Future of Handwriting , recentlywroteinThe New York Times — it ’s not likely to disappear from schooltime anytime soon .
[ h / tKQED ]
Know of something you think we should cover ? Email us attips@mentalfloss.com .
